Hall v. State , 30 Ga. App. 293 ( 1923 )

Per Curiam.

1. There was some evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.

2. None of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodwortli, J., concur. Lulce, J., dissents. V. E. Padgett, for plaintiff in error. Alvin V. Sellers, solicitor-general, contra.