Hill v. State , 30 Ga. App. 619 ( 1923 )

Broyles, O. J.

The testimony of the accomplice was sufficiently corroborated by the other facts and circumstance’s of the case; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.