Ray v. State , 31 Ga. App. 119 ( 1923 )

Bboyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and, while some errors were committed upon the trial, none of them, under the particular facts of the case, requires a new trial. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Paul L. Lindsay, for plaintiff in error. Boy Dorsey, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, contra.