Eason v. State , 31 Ga. App. 172 ( 1923 )


Menu:
  • Luke, J.

    The defendant complains that her conviction was not authorized by the evidence. The evidence was conflicting, but, the jury having believed the evidence for the State, showing her guilt, and the trial judge having approved the verdict, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

    Affvrmed.

    Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorlh, J., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: 14919

Citation Numbers: 31 Ga. App. 172, 120 S.E. 22, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 814

Judges: Luke

Filed Date: 11/15/1923

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024