Bailey v. Gardner , 31 Ga. App. 292 ( 1923 )

Luke, J.

1. The evidence was conflicting, and the judgment will not be reversed upon the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of alleged errors in the introduction of evidence, in the court’s charge, and of the failure to- charge, contain no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur. Albert Kemper, A. L. Henson, for plaintiff. J. G. B. Brwin, for defendant.