Joe v. State , 32 Ga. App. 326 ( 1924 )

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction. There being no insistence upon the special assignments of error in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, and the trial judge having approved the finding of the jury, there is no legal reason why the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial should be set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and, Bloodworth, J., concur.