Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co. , 32 Ga. App. 447 ( 1924 )


Menu:
  • Bloodworth, J.

    Under the facts of this case and the ruling in Lanier v. Bailey, 120 Ga. 878 (1) (48 S. E. 324), the court did not err in directing a verdict for the claimant. See, in this connection, Williams v. Herrington, 12 Ga. App. 77 (1) (76 S. E. 757); Baughman Automobile Co. v. Emanuel, 137 Ga. 354 (73 S. E. 511, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 97).

    Judgment affirmed.

    Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. Hamilton McWhorter Jr., for plaintiff. Irvin & Fortson, for defendant.

Document Info

Docket Number: 15530

Citation Numbers: 32 Ga. App. 447, 123 S.E. 756, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 450

Judges: Bloodworth

Filed Date: 6/10/1924

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024