Newberry v. State , 34 Ga. App. 533 ( 1925 )

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial contained but one ground, to wit, that the court erred in refusing the defendant’s motion to direct a verdict in his favor. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the refusal to direct a verdict is never error.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth,: JJ., eoneur. B. B. Marlin, J. H. Fletcher, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general,' B. B. Arnold, E. C. Hill, contra.