Wilkes v. Tennessee Chemical Co. ( 1925 )

Bloodworth, J.

The court did' not err in striking the answer of the defendant as amended, nor in thereafter awarding judgment in fay;or of the plaintiff for the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees sued for.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Hill & McElvey, Butch Wilkes, M. A. Warren, for plaintiff in error. Pope & Bennet, contra.