-
Luke, J. The plaintiff in error contends that the conviction of burglary should not stand because there was not sufficient corroboration of the testimony of an accomplice. The jury were fully authorized to find that there was such corroboration. The judge, having approved the verdict, did not, for any reason pointed out, err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, <7., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: 16975
Citation Numbers: 35 Ga. App. 169
Judges: Bloodworth, Broyles, Luke
Filed Date: 3/2/1926
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023