Adams v. Fleming ( 1926 )

Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the petition as amended.

2. Under the facts of the case the failure to instruct the jury upon the law of the statute of limitations was not error.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of .the motion for a new trial require another hearing of the ease.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.