Eason v. State , 37 Ga. App. 379 ( 1927 )


Menu:
  • Bloodworth, J.

    There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that requires a retrial of the case. Granting that there were irregularities in the proceedings, they were not of such a character as to demand a reversal of the judgment, especially as the evidence demanded the verdict.

    Judgment affirmed.

    Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: 18419

Citation Numbers: 37 Ga. App. 379, 140 S.E. 640, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 697

Judges: Bloodworth

Filed Date: 11/16/1927

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024