Dodgen v. Fowler , 39 Ga. App. 515 ( 1929 )


Menu:
  • Luke, J.

    The evidence in the record being in sharp conflict as to material matters, this case comes within the rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed when the verdict is not demanded by the law and the facts. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Douglas v. Hardin, 161 Ga. 838 (2) (131 S. E. 896); Carr v. Carr, 157 Ga. 208 (121 S. E. 227) ; Parks v. Stevens, 21 Ga. App. 180 (94 S. E. 60) ; Louisville, & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).

    Judgment affirmed.

    Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. John T. Dorsey, John G. Bell, Morris, Hawlcins & Wallace, for plaintiffs in error. Mozley & Gann, L. M. Blair, contra.

Document Info

Docket Number: 19374

Citation Numbers: 39 Ga. App. 515, 147 S.E. 775, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 388

Judges: Luke

Filed Date: 4/9/1929

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024