-
Broyles, C. J. 1. The order sustaining the demurrer to the petition and allowing a stated time in which to amend it, to which no exception was taken, fixed the law of the case; and, the plaintiff’s amendment having failed to meet the objections raised .by the demurrer (the amendment in all substantial respects being merely a reiteration of the allegations ' of the original petition), the trial court did not err in dismissing the petition. Baker v. Atlanta, 22 Ga. App. 483 (96 S. E. 332), and cit.; Grossman v. Atlanta, 25 Ga. App. 161 (102 S. E. 847).
2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant cases, the judge of'the superior court in each case properly overruled the certiorari. Judgments affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.
Document Info
Docket Number: 19938; 19940; 19941
Citation Numbers: 40 Ga. App. 538, 150 S.E. 436, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 631
Judges: Broyles
Filed Date: 11/13/1929
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024