Craven v. State , 40 Ga. App. 652 ( 1929 )

Broyles, C. J.

1. In view of the note of the trial judge, the refusal to continue the case was not error.

2. The remaining special ground of the motion for a new trial is without merit.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.