Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co. ( 1940 )

Guerry, J.

I. The evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to authorize a finding that if the purchase of the property was unauthorized in the first instance, the defendant, by her conduct, had estopped herself to deny that the property sued for was purchased for her benefit and in her behalf.

Decided February 28, 1940. R. B. Pullen, for plaintiff in error. G. B. Tidwell, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and- MacIntyre, J., concur.