Christine Metter v. Loni D. Metter ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    June 19, 2017
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A17D0477. CHRISTINE METTER v. LONI D. METTER.
    This case was initiated when Loni D. Metter filed a petition seeking to adopt
    her three minor stepchildren. Acknowledging that the children’s biological mother,
    Christine Metter, was alive, Loni D. Metter further sought in her petition the
    termination of Christine Metter’s parental rights. On May 4, 2017, the trial court
    entered an order terminating Christine Metter’s parental rights, and further
    designating a time frame for scheduling a final adoption hearing.
    From that order, Christine Metter filed the instant pro se discretionary
    application. She also has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. For reasons
    that follow, we lack jurisdiction.
    Ordinarily, a party seeking to appeal an order terminating parental rights must
    file an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (12). But where,
    as here, the contested order did not resolve all issues in the case, the case remains
    pending in the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) (providing for a direct appeal
    from a “final judgment[ ], that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the
    court below”). Thus, Christine Metter was required to follow the interlocutory appeal
    procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 
    266 Ga. 832
    , 832-833 (471
    SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 
    261 Ga. 587
    , 588-589
    (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991); Park v. Bailey, 
    329 Ga. App. 569
    , 571 (765 SE2d 721)
    (2014); Gray v. Springs, 
    224 Ga. App. 427
    , 427 (481 SE2d 3) (1997). Because she
    did not do so, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby
    DISMISSED.1
    Christine Metter’s motion for the appointment of counsel is accordingly
    DISMISSED as MOOT. See In the Interest of B. R. F., 
    299 Ga. 294
    , 298-299 (788
    SE2d 416) (2016) (explaining that appellate court could not reach issue concerning
    whether indigent parent was entitled to appointment of counsel, where parent failed
    to perfect jurisdiction).
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    06/19/2017
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    1
    But see Rokowski v. Gilbert, 
    275 Ga. App. 305
    , 305 (1) (620 SE2d 509)
    (2005) (explaining that a timely filed notice of appeal from a final judgment and
    decree of adoption gave appellate court jurisdiction to consider previous orders
    entered in case, including an order terminating the biological father’s parental rights).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A17D0477

Filed Date: 7/4/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/4/2017