Melvin I. Taylor v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    January 06, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A0500. MELVIN I. TAYLOR v. THE STATE.
    Melvin I. Taylor was convicted of several offenses including rape and incest,
    and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. See Taylor v. State, 
    268 Ga. App. 333
    (601 SE2d 815) (2004). Boyd subsequently filed a pro se motion to vacate his
    allegedly void sentence, which the trial court denied. Boyd then filed this appeal.
    We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate
    remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 
    286 Ga. 216
    , 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786)
    (2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be
    dismissed. See id. at 218 (2); Roberts v. State, 
    286 Ga. 532
    , 532 (690 SE2d 150)
    (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct
    a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence
    is, in fact, void. See Harper, supra at 217 n.1; Burg v. State, 
    297 Ga. App. 118
    , 119
    (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to
    claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the
    sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically
    because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute
    provides.” von Thomas v. State, 
    293 Ga. 569
    , 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Thus,
    when a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is not void. Jones v.
    State, 
    278 Ga. 669
    , 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).
    In his motion, Taylor did not argue that his sentence fell outside the permissible
    statutory range; rather, he contended that his indictment process was flawed. This is
    not a valid void-sentence claim. See Jones v. State, 
    290 Ga. App. 490
    , 493 (1) (659
    SE2d 875) (2008). Because Taylor has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim,
    this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Roberts, supra.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    01/06/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A0500

Filed Date: 1/11/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/11/2016