Carl Moore v. Penny Mac Corp. ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    October 20, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A17A0326. MOORE v. PENNYMAC CORP.
    In this quiet title case involving multiple parties, Carl Moore appeals from the
    trial court’s entry of default judgment against him. Appellee PennyMac Corp. has filed
    a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the default judgment from which
    Moore appeals was not a final judgment and was not directly appealable because the
    case remained pending in the trial court.
    In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision
    adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less
    than all the parties is not a final judgment. In such circumstances, there
    must be an express determination under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b)[1] or there
    must be compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA
    § 5-6-34 (b). Where neither of these code sections are followed, the
    appeal is premature and must be dismissed.
    (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 
    192 Ga. App. 628
    , 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989). See generally OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1).
    The entry of default judgment against Moore did not adjudicate the claims,
    rights, and/or liabilities of a third party involved in the lawsuit. Therefore, the default
    judgment was not a final judgment within the contemplation of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1)
    1
    OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) provides, that “[w]hen more than one claim for relief is
    presented in an action, . . . or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct
    the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or
    parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay . . . .”
    and was not immediately appealable as a matter of right. See Johnson, 192 Ga. App.
    at 629. Moreover, the trial court made no express determination in the judgment that
    pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) there was no just reason for delay.
    Because neither OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) nor OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) was followed,
    Moore’s appeal was premature and must be dismissed.2 See generally Wise v. Ga. State
    Bd. for Examination, Qualification & Registration of Architects, 
    244 Ga. 449
    -450 (260
    SE2d 477) (1979). Therefore, it is ordered that Appellee PennyMac Corp.’s motion to
    dismiss this appeal is hereby GRANTED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    10/20/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    2
    Approximately two months after the trial court entered the default judgment
    against Moore, the court entered a “Final Decree and Judgment Quieting Title Against
    All the World.” This order, unlike the default judgment order, contained language
    adjudicating the claims, rights, and/or liabilities of the third party to the litigation. No
    appeal from this final order is noted in the record.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A17A0326

Filed Date: 10/25/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/25/2016