Michael Antonio Hickman v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    August 14, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19A0061. MICHAEL ANTONIO HICKMAN v. THE STATE.
    In August 2010, following a bench trial, Michael Antonio Hickman was found
    guilty of aggravated assault and attempting to commit hijacking of a motor vehicle, for
    which he was sentenced, as a recidivist, to twenty years in prison for the aggravated
    assault count and a consecutive five-year prison term for the criminal attempt count.
    Hickman’s convictions were affirmed on appeal. Hickman v. State, 
    311 Ga. App. 544
    (716 SE2d 597) (2011). In August 2016, Hickman filed a motion to vacate a void
    sentence, asserting generally that his sentences were beyond what the law allows. The
    trial court denied the motion, and Hickman filed this direct appeal.
    Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year after
    its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal, whichever
    is later. Frazier v. State, 
    302 Ga. App. 346
    , 348 (691 SE2d 247) (2010). Once this
    statutory period expires, a trial court may modify only a void sentence. 
    Id.
     A
    sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Jones
    v. State, 
    278 Ga. 669
    , 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004). When a sentence falls within the
    statutory range of punishment, it is not void and is not subject to modification beyond
    the time provided in § 17-10-1 (f). See id. A direct appeal does not lie from the denial
    of a motion to modify a sentence filed outside the statutory time period unless the
    motion raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. Frazier, 302 Ga.
    App. at 348.
    Here, Hickman has not raised a colorable claim that his sentences are in fact
    void. Hickman merely asserts the sentences imposed were not allowed by law without
    any supporting argument. However, each of Hickman’s sentences to do exceed the
    statutory maximum sentence.      See OCGA § 16-5-21 (a person convicted of
    aggravated assault may be punished by imprisonment for not more than twenty years);
    OCGA §§ 16-4-1 and 16-5-44.1 (a person convicted of attempt to commit hijacking
    of a motor vehicle may be punished by imprisonment of not more than twenty years).
    Accordingly, Hickman is not entitled to a direct appeal, and this appeal is hereby
    DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    08/14/2018
    I certify that the above is a true extract f rom
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A19A0061

Filed Date: 8/27/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/27/2018