Melvin Willis v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    August 09, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A2105. MELVIN WILLIS v. THE STATE.
    Melvin Willis was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced as a recidivist to
    life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. The State appealed Willis’s
    sentence, and Willis appealed his conviction. We affirmed the conviction, but
    vacated his sentence. State v. Willis, 
    218 Ga. App. 402
    (461 SE2d 576) (1995). We
    ruled that the version of OCGA § 17-10-7 applicable to his offense required that his
    sentence not allow the possibility of parole, and we remanded the case to the trial
    court to resentence Willis accordingly. 
    Id. at 405
    (5). On remand, the trial court re-
    sentenced Willis to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
    Willis later filed a motion to correct a void sentence, arguing that he had been
    improperly sentenced as a recidivist. The trial court denied the motion, and Willis
    appealed. We dismissed the appeal, ruling that Willis failed to show that his sentence
    exceeded the maximum permissible under the law because a trial court may sentence
    a defendant to life imprisonment for armed robbery regardless of whether the
    defendant is deemed a recidivist. See Willis v. State, Case No. A08A0284, dismissed
    October 5, 2007 (citing OCGA § 16-8-41 (b)).
    In 2016, Willis filed a “Motion to Set Aside Void Conviction,” arguing that he
    received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, that the trial court improperly
    charged the jury, and that the prosecutor committed various errors. Willis also filed
    a second “Motion to Correct Void Sentence,” arguing that he should not have been
    sentenced as a recidivist for various reasons. The trial court denied both motions in
    two separate orders, and Willis now appeals both orders. We, however, lack
    jurisdiction.
    With respect to the order denying Willis’s motion to set aside his conviction,
    “[a] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate
    remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 
    286 Ga. 216
    , 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786)
    (2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be
    dismissed. See 
    id. at 218
    (2); Roberts v. State, 
    286 Ga. 532
    , 532 (690 SE2d 150)
    (2010). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider the trial court’s order denying
    Willis’s motion to set aside his conviction.
    With respect to the order denying Willis’s motion to correct a void sentence,
    we ruled in the State’s appeal from Willis’s sentence that Willis was required to be
    sentenced as a recidivist, that the State had given Willis proper notice of its intent to
    use his prior convictions against him at sentencing, and that the State had introduced
    certified records of at least five prior felony convictions at Willis’s presentence
    hearing. 
    Willis, 218 Ga. App. at 404
    (5). Moreover, we dismissed Willis’s
    subsequent appeal from the trial court’s denial of his first motion to correct a void
    sentence, ruling—in essence—that he had no colorable void-sentence claim because
    his sentence fell within the permissible statutory range for armed robbery. “It is well
    established that any issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law
    of the case and is binding on this Court and that the law of the case doctrine is not
    confined to civil cases, but applies also to rulings made by appellate courts in
    criminal cases.” Ross v. State, 
    310 Ga. App. 326
    , 327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011)
    (punctuation and footnote omitted). We have already ruled on the propriety of
    recidivist sentencing in this case, and Willis “is not entitled to multiple bites at the
    apple.” 
    Id. at 328;
    see also Jackson v. State, 
    273 Ga. 320
    (540 SE2d 612) (2001).
    For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    08/09/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A2105

Filed Date: 8/10/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/10/2016