Sparkles of Gwinnett, Inc. v. Tenita Hendrix ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    February 14, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A18D0280. SPARKLES OF GWINNETT, INC. v. TENITA HENDRIX et al.
    Eleven months after a default judgment was entered in this civil action against
    defendant Sparkles of Gwinnett, Inc., Sparkles filed an OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) motion
    to set aside the judgment. The trial court denied Sparkles’s motion, and Sparkles
    filed this application for discretionary review. We lack jurisdiction.
    In its denial order, the trial court noted that the plaintiff’s motion to compel and
    for sanctions remained pending before that court. Consequently, the order Sparkles
    seeks to appeal is a non-final order that did not resolve all issues in the case. See
    Avco Lycoming v. Newton Aero, Inc., 
    146 Ga. App. 609
    , 610 (247 SE2d 135) (1978);
    accord Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Hill, 
    252 Ga. App. 774
    , 774-775 (1) (556
    SE2d 468) (2001) (an order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment is not
    final where the case remains pending against other defendants); Cornelius v. Finley,
    
    204 Ga. App. 299
    , 300-301 (418 SE2d 815) (1992) (an order compelling post-
    judgment discovery “is not final in the sense of being dispositive of the case, as
    contemplated by OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1),” where disputed discovery remains
    unanswered). Sparkles therefore was required to follow the interlocutory appeal
    procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 
    266 Ga. 832
    , 832-
    833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 
    261 Ga. 587
    ,
    588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991). Where, as here, both discretionary and
    interlocutory appeal procedures apply, an applicant must follow the interlocutory
    appeal procedures and obtain a timely certificate of immediate review from the trial
    court before filing an application. See 
    Scruggs, 261 Ga. at 588-589
    (1); see also
    OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8) (an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside under
    § 9-11-60 (d) must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review).
    Sparkles’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedures deprives us of
    jurisdiction over this premature application, which is hereby DISMISSED. See
    
    Bailey, 266 Ga. at 833
    .
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    02/14/2018
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A18D0280

Filed Date: 2/22/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/22/2018