Angela Collins v. Xytex Corporation ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    March 17, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A1139. A16A1141. ANGELA COLLINS et al. v. XYTEX CORPORATION
    et al.
    Plaintiffs Angela Collins and Margaret Elizabeth Hanson filed an action
    against defendants Xytex Corporation, Xytex Cryo International, LTD, Mary Hartley,
    (collectively referred to as “Xytex”), and James Christian Aggeles (“the donor”),
    alleging the defendants withheld pertinent information and misrepresented
    information regarding a sperm donor. Xytex filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’
    claims. On October 20, 2015, the trial court granted Xytex’s motion to dismiss and
    dismissed all the claims as to all the defendants, including the donor. The plaintiffs
    filed a notice of appeal on November 24, 2015.1 Xytex also filed a cross-appeal
    regarding the trial court’s October 20, 2015 order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the trial
    court’s order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal
    is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this Court. See Couch v.
    United Paperworkers Intl. Union, 
    224 Ga. App. 721
     (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Here,
    the plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal 35 days after the trial court’s order was
    entered. Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ appeal in A16A1139 is untimely, and it is hereby
    DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
    Although under OCGA § 5-6-48 (e), a cross-appeal may survive the dismissal
    1
    It appears from the record that the plaintiffs attempted to file a timely notice
    of appeal that was returned by the Fulton County Superior Court for failing to follow
    mandatory e-filing requirements.
    of the main appeal, this is true only where the cross-appeal can stand on its own
    merit. This Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a cross-appeal which must derive
    its life from the main appeal. See State, DOT v. Douglas Asphalt Co., 
    297 Ga. App. 511
    , 514 (677 SE2d 728) (2009). As the cross-appeal cannot stand on its own merit,
    this Court has no jurisdiction over the appeal. See 
    id.
     Thus, Xytex’s cross-appeal in
    A16A1141 is also hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    03/17/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A1139

Filed Date: 4/4/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/4/2016