Michael Christopher Dodson v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    December 20, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A18A1770. MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER DODSON v. THE STATE.
    We granted interlocutory review of the trial court’s order denying Michael
    Christopher Dodson’s motion to suppress the results of a breath-alcohol test. One of
    the arguments made by Dodson in his motion was that the implied consent statute,
    OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b), violated the provision of Georgia’s Constitution prohibiting
    a person from being “compelled to give testimony tending in any manner to be self-
    incriminating.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XVI. In a September 7, 2017
    order, the trial court rejected this argument and held that the implied consent statute
    did not violate Georgia’s Constitution. The trial court cited Klink v. State, 
    272 Ga. 605
    (533 SE2d 92) (2000), in support of that conclusion.
    The following month, in Olevik v. State, 
    302 Ga. 228
    , 244-246 (2) (c) (iv) (806
    SE2d 505) (2017), our Supreme Court overruled Klink “to the extent [it held] that
    Paragraph XVI of the Georgia Constitution does not protect against compelled breath
    tests[.]” Nevertheless, the Supreme Court rejected the defendant’s challenges to
    OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b). 
    Olevik, 302 Ga. at 246-252
    (3). The facts in this appeal are
    similar but not identical to those in Olevik because Dodson does not have a Georgia
    driver’s license.
    The Supreme Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction in “all cases in which
    the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been drawn
    in question.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1). Because the trial court
    rejected Dodson’s challenge to the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b) in
    reliance on a decision subsequently overruled in Olevik, and the facts in this case are
    not fully analogous to those in Olevik, jurisdiction over this appeal may lie in the
    Supreme Court. As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining
    appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 
    267 Ga. 177
    , 178
    (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court
    for disposition.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    12/20/2018
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A18A1770

Filed Date: 1/8/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/8/2019