Elliott Jay Franklin v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    February 04, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A0805. ELLIOTT JAY FRANKLIN v. THE STATE.
    In 2002, Elliott Franklin was convicted of possession of cocaine and marijuana
    with intent to distribute and obstruction of an officer. We affirmed his judgment of
    conviction on direct appeal. Franklin v. State, 
    281 Ga. App. 409
     (636 SE2d 114)
    (2006). In 2015, Franklin filed an extraordinary motion for a new trial, in which he
    argued that his conviction and sentence were void for various reasons. The trial court
    denied Franklin’s motion on November 16, 2015, after which he filed a notice of
    appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.
    An order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by
    application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 
    227 Ga. App. 327
    , 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Thus, Franklin is not entitled to a direct
    appeal from the order he challenges. Even if Franklin’s motion properly were
    construed as seeking to vacate a void conviction or sentence, this appeal still would
    be subject to dismissal.
    “It is well established that any issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier
    appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this Court, and that the law of the case
    doctrine is not confined to civil cases, but applies also to rulings made by appellate
    courts in criminal cases.” Ross v. State, 
    310 Ga. App. 326
    , 327 (713 SE2d 438)
    (2011) (citations and punctuation omitted). In 2014 and 2015, we dismissed
    Franklin’s appeals from the denials of prior motions in which he sought to vacate his
    conviction and sentence as void, on the ground that the trial court’s orders were not
    appealable. See Franklin v. State, Nos. A14A1607, A14A1608 (May 16, 2014);
    Franklin v. State, No. A16A0031 (Oct. 7, 2015). We are precluded from revisiting
    issues that already have been decided. See Ross, supra at 328. For these reasons, this
    appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    02/04/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A0805

Filed Date: 2/18/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2016