Paul Scott Finch v. Beverly Elaine (Evans) Finch ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    February 23, 2017
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A17D0272. PAUL SCOTT FINCH v. BEVERLY ELAINE (EVANS) FINCH et
    al.
    Plaintiff Paul Finch (“Husband”) seeks discretionary review of the “Final
    Judgment and Decree” of the trial court in this divorce action. We lack jurisdiction.
    While designated a “Final Judgment” and granting a divorce, the order
    Husband seeks to appeal expressly reserved ruling on a motion for contempt filed by
    intervenor Paulette Evans. “[W]here, as here, a divorce is granted by an order which
    leaves other issues for decision in the trial court, it is an interlocutory, not a final,
    order.” Miller v. Miller, 
    288 Ga. 274
    , 281 (4) (705 SE2d 839) (2010) (punctuation
    omitted); accord Carr v. Carr, 
    238 Ga. 197
    , 197 (232 SE2d 69) (1977); see also
    Planet Ins. Co. v. Ferrell, 
    228 Ga. App. 264
    , 266 (491 SE2d 471) (1997)
    (“[P]leadings, motions and orders are to be construed according to their substance and
    function and not merely as to their nomenclature . . . .”). Husband therefore was
    required to follow the procedures for interlocutory review as set forth in OCGA
    § 5-6-34 (b). See Miller v. Miller, 
    282 Ga. 164
    , 164-165 (646 SE2d 469) (2007)
    (interlocutory application required to appeal “Final Judgment and Decree of Divorce”
    in which trial court reserved ruling on parties’ eligibility for certain government
    benefits); 
    Carr, 238 Ga. at 197-198
    (interlocutory application required to appeal
    judgment granting divorce decree where trial court reserved a decision on property
    settlement and alimony). Where both discretionary and interlocutory application
    procedures apply, the applicant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedure and
    obtain a timely certificate of immediate review before filing an application. See
    
    Miller, 282 Ga. at 164-165
    ; 
    Carr, 238 Ga. at 197-198
    ; see also OCGA §§ 5-6-34 (b);
    5-6-35 (a) (2).
    Husband’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedures deprives us of
    jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    02/23/2017
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A17D0272

Filed Date: 3/15/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021