Lee Stewart v. Sandra Halouska ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    October 03, 2019
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19A2209. LEE STEWART v. SANDRA HALOUSKA.
    Sandra Halouska filed a civil action against her tenant, Lee Stewart, seeking
    to recover past-due rent and to evict Stewart from the property. On May 6, 2019, the
    Municipal Court of Columbus, Muscogee County, entered a judgment in the amount
    of $4,400 and a writ of possession in Halouska’s favor. Stewart filed a motion to set
    aside the judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d). The trial court denied the motion
    and, on May 28, 2019, Stewart filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction because
    Stewart was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review
    before this Court.
    To the extent the underlying case was an action for damages, it falls within
    OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), which provides that where a money judgment in an action for
    damages totals $10,000.00 or less, a party must follow the discretionary appeal
    procedures to obtain appellate review. See Jennings v. Moss, 
    235 Ga. App. 357
    , 357
    (509 SE2d 655) (1998).
    To the extent the underlying case was a dispossessory proceeding, the notice
    of appeal was timely only as to the trial court’s May 22 order denying Stewart’s
    motion to set aside. See OCGA § 44-7-56 (appeals in dispossessory actions must be
    filed within seven days of the date the judgment was entered); Ray M. Wright, Inc. v.
    Jones, 
    239 Ga. App. 521
    , 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-
    35 (a) (8), however, a party must follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain
    appellate review of an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment under OCGA
    § 9-11-60. See Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 
    283 Ga. App. 116
    , 116 (640 SE2d
    688) (2006).
    Stewart’s failure to follow the required procedure deprives us of jurisdiction
    to consider his appeal. See Jennings, 235 Ga. App. at 357. For these reasons, this
    appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    10/03/2019
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A19A2209

Filed Date: 10/4/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/4/2019