Davis v. the State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                            FIRST DIVISION
    PHIPPS, C. J.,
    ELLINGTON, P. J., and MCMILLIAN, J.
    NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be
    physically received in our clerk’s office within ten
    days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.
    http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
    November 21, 2014
    In the Court of Appeals of Georgia
    A14A1463. DAVIS v. THE STATE.
    PHIPPS, Chief Judge.
    Wayne Anthony Davis appeals his convictions for kidnapping (with bodily
    injury),1 aggravated assault (family violence),2 and failure to register as a sex
    offender.3 He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions.
    1
    OCGA § 16-5-40 (a) (“A person commits the offense of kidnapping when
    such person abducts or steals away another person without lawful authority or warrant
    and holds such other person against his or her will.”); OCGA § 16-5-40 (d) (4)
    (regarding punishment where the person kidnapped received bodily injury).
    2
    OCGA §§ 16-5-21 (b) (“A person commits the offense of aggravated assault
    when he or she assaults: . . . (2) With a deadly weapon or with any object, device or
    instrument which, when used offensively against a person, is likely to or actually does
    result in serious bodily injury.” ); OCGA § 16-5-21 (k) (regarding punishment where
    the offense is committed between, pertinently, persons living or formerly living in the
    same household).
    3
    OCGA § 42-1-12.
    The evidence was sufficient to support the convictions for kidnapping and aggravated
    assault, so we affirm those convictions. However, because the evidence was not
    sufficient to support the conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, we reverse
    that conviction.
    In assessing whether the evidence was sufficient to support
    [Davis’s] convictions, we neither weigh the evidence nor judge the
    credibility of witnesses, but determine only whether, after viewing the
    evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier
    of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a
    reasonable doubt.4
    So viewed, the evidence showed the following. Davis and L. A. had been
    dating for several years and, from January 2011 to about May 2011, Davis resided
    with L. A. in her home on Corps Airport Road in Decatur County, Georgia “the
    majority of the time.” Although Davis operated a business in Bristol, Florida, he kept
    clothing and other personal items at L. A.’s home, usually going to her home when
    he left work; he “stayed” in L. A.’s home more than 30 days in 2011.
    4
    Dorsey v. State, 
    327 Ga. App. 226
    , 227-228 (757 SE2d 880) (2014) (footnote
    and punctuation omitted).
    2
    On about May 2, 2011, about two days after L. A. ended the relationship, Davis
    entered L. A.’s home and struck L. A. with a baseball bat several times on the head
    and on the arm. He bound her hands, placed her in the trunk of a vehicle, and poured
    gasoline over her head. With L. A. in the truck, Davis drove the vehicle for about 30
    to 45 minutes, then let L. A. out of the trunk in a wooded area in Bristol, Florida and
    threatened to kill her. L. A., who was then bleeding, dizzy, and unable to stand or
    walk, persuaded Davis to summon help for her. Davis phoned 911, and L. A. was
    taken by ambulance to a Tallahassee, Florida hospital. There, L. A. received, along
    with other treatment, stitches to repair 20 centimeters of lacerations to her head.
    When asked at trial whether L. A.’s injuries were significant, the emergency room
    physician who had treated her characterized them as “horrible.”
    1. Without stating any specific basis therefor, Davis contends that the evidence
    was insufficient to support the convictions for kidnapping (with bodily injury)5 and
    5
    The indictment charged Davis with kidnapping, pertinently alleging that he
    abducted L. A. without lawful authority and held her against her will, with said act
    resulting in bodily injury to L. A.
    3
    aggravated assault.6 Based on the evidence presented, the contention is without
    merit.7
    2. Davis contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he failed to
    adhere to the requirements of OCGA § 42-1-12 (e) (7) because: (a) he was not
    required to register the Corps Airport Road address, which was only his temporary
    address; and (b) testimony from the state’s witness regarding Davis’s alleged failure
    to register was insufficient to prove that he had failed to register as required by the
    statute.
    The indictment charged that Davis committed the offense of failure to register
    as a sex offender in that on or about May 2, 2011, in Decatur County, Georgia, he was
    required to register pursuant to OCGA § 42-1-12 (e) by virtue of having
    previously been convicted of the offense of Lewd Assault, Sexual
    Battery on Minor . . . on June 14, 1999, in Gadsden County, Florida, . .
    . and having been released from prison and having moved to the State
    of Georgia, did fail to comply with the requirements of OCGA § 42-1-12
    6
    The indictment charged Davis with aggravated assault (family violence),
    pertinently alleging that he assaulted L. A. with a baseball bat, an object which when
    used offensively is likely to and actually did cause serious bodily injury by striking
    her arm and head, and that Davis and L. A. formerly had lived in the same household.
    7
    See generally Kinsey v. State, 
    326 Ga. App. 616
    , 626 (7) (a) (757 SE2d 217)
    (2014); Lewis v. State, 
    317 Ga. App. 218
    , 220 (1) (735 SE2d 1) (2012).
    4
    (f) by failing to notify the Decatur County Sheriff’s Office, within 72
    hours prior to establishing his new residence, in violation of OCGA §
    42-1-12 (n).
    OCGA § 42-1-12 (e) pertinently provides:
    Registration pursuant to this Code section shall be required by any
    individual who: (1) Is convicted on or after July 1, 1996, of a criminal
    offense against a victim who is a minor; (2) Is convicted on or after July
    1, 1996, of a dangerous sexual offense; (3) Has previously been
    convicted of a criminal offense against a victim who is a minor and may
    be released from prison or placed on parole, supervised release, or
    probation on or after July 1, 1996; (4) Has previously been convicted of
    a sexually violent offense or dangerous sexual offense and may be
    released from prison or placed on parole, supervised release, or
    probation on or after July 1, 1996; . . . (7) Is a nonresident sexual
    offender who enters this state for the purpose of employment or any
    other reason for a period exceeding 14 consecutive days or for an
    aggregate period of time exceeding 30 days during any calendar year
    regardless of whether such sexual offender is required to register under
    federal law, military law, tribal law, or the laws of another state or
    territory[.]
    OCGA § 42-1-12 (f) pertinently provides:
    Any sexual offender required to register under this Code section shall:
    . . . (2) Register in person with the sheriff of the county in which the
    sexual offender resides within 72 hours after the sexual offender’s
    5
    release from prison or placement on parole, supervised release,
    probation, or entry into this state; . . . (3) Maintain the required
    registration information with the sheriff of each county in which the
    sexual offender resides or sleeps[.]
    Any sex offender who fails to register as required under OCGA § 42-1-12 and who
    fails to comply with the requirements of said code section shall be guilty of a felony.8
    Assuming, without deciding, that Davis was required to notify the Decatur
    County Sheriff’s Office that he was establishing the Corps Airport Road address as
    his residence, the state did not prove that he had failed to give such notice.
    At trial,9 to prove the charge that Davis had failed to register as a sex offender
    as alleged in the indictment, the state called only one witness. After the witness stated
    her name and affirmed that she had been sworn, the following examination occurred:
    Q: [L.C.], what do you do for the sheriff’s office?
    A: I register sex offenders.
    Q: What does that mean?
    A: If you’re a convicted sex offender, you have to register in the state
    where you live or where you’re employed, if you are in the state
    vacationing or volunteering, you have to register with that county where
    you are at.
    8
    OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) (1).
    9
    This was the second part of the bifurcated jury trial.
    6
    Q: And how many days do they have to be living there in the calendar
    year in order for them to register with you?
    A: If they’re there for 14 days or 30 day in calendar year, they have to
    register with the sheriff’s office.
    Q: And has a Wayne Anthony Davis ever registered and [sic] address on
    Corps Airport Road with you?10
    A: No, sir, he has not.
    Q: Have you ever seen him before?
    A: No.
    Q: And he has to register within 72 hours of changing the residence; is
    that correct?
    A: Seventy-two hours prior to moving, they have to register.
    The witness gave no further testimony. We note that the witness did not testify,
    for example, that she was working at the sheriff’s office at the time Davis was
    required to register, or that she was the only person in that office with whom Davis
    could have registered; nor did the witness testify that if Davis had registered with the
    sheriff’s office, his registration would be included in certain records and that she had
    reviewed such records, but that no such registration was included therein.
    “[T]he burden of proof rests upon the State to prove every material allegation
    of the indictment and every essential element of the crime charged beyond a
    10
    (Emphasis supplied.)
    7
    reasonable doubt.” 11 A rational trier of fact could not have found beyond a reasonable
    doubt from the evidence presented that Davis violated the sex offender registration
    requirements of OCGA § 42-1-12.12 Therefore, the conviction for failure to register
    as a sex offender must be reversed.
    Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Ellington, P. J., and
    McMillian, J., concur.
    11
    Sharpe v. State, 
    291 Ga. 148
    , 151 (4) (728 SE2d 217) (2012) (citation
    omitted); see OCGA § 16-1-5 (“Every person is presumed innocent until proved
    guilty. No person shall be convicted of a crime unless each element of such crime is
    proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”).
    12
    See generally Eilers v. State, 
    304 Ga. App. 607
    -608 (697 SE2d 295) (2010).
    8
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A14A1463

Judges: Phipps, Ellington, McMillian

Filed Date: 11/21/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024