Kingwood International Resort, LLC v. Richard Clark, Personally, and on Behalf of Rick's at Achasta ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    October 08, 2019
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A20I0052. KINGWOOD INTERNATIONAL RESORT, LLC et al. v.
    RICHARD CLARK, PERSONALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF RICK’S AT
    ACHASTA
    Defendants Kingwood International Resort, LLC, and Kingwood Dahlonega
    International Resort, LLC, seek interlocutory review of the trial court’s order denying
    their motion for summary judgment. We lack jurisdiction because the certificate of
    immediate review was not entered within ten days of the trial court’s order.
    Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only
    if the trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate
    review should be had. A timely certificate of immediate review is a jurisdictional
    requirement. See Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc., 
    133 Ga. App. 23
    , 24 (2)
    (209 SE2d 715) (1974). If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within
    that ten-day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until the
    final judgment to appeal.       See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Wilcher v. Confederate
    Packaging, Inc., 
    287 Ga. App. 451
    , 452 (1) (651 SE2d 790) (2007) (“A certificate of
    immediate review of a court order must be signed by the trial judge and filed with the
    clerk of the trial court within ten days of the entry of the interlocutory order sought
    to be appealed.”).
    Here, the trial court entered its order denying the defendants’ motion for
    summary judgment on August 27, 2019. Seventeen days later, on September 13, the
    court entered an order granting the defendants’ request for a certificate of immediate
    review. Although the trial court signed the certificate of immediate review on
    September 6, the relevant date for determining the timeliness of the certificate is the
    date it was filed with the clerk of the trial court. See Van Schallern v. Stanco, 
    130 Ga. App. 687
    , 687 (204 SE2d 317) (1974). Accordingly, the certificate was untimely
    and this application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    10/08/2019
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A20I0052

Filed Date: 10/25/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/25/2019