Confesor Chaparro v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    April 10, 2019
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19A1643. CONFESOR CHAPARRO v. THE STATE.
    In 2004, a jury found Confesor Chaparro guilty of four counts of aggravated
    child molestation, and the trial court imposed a total sentence of 30 years in prison,
    to be followed by 20 years on probation. We affirmed his judgment of conviction on
    direct appeal. Chaparro v. State, 
    279 Ga. App. 145
     (630 SE2d 645) (2006).
    In September 2018, Chaparro filed a “Motion for Extraordinary Relief,” which
    the trial court denied in November 2018.1 Chaparro sought appellate review of the
    November 2018 order by filing both a direct appeal – which has been docketed as the
    instant case, No. A19A1643 – and an application for discretionary review, which we
    dismissed on the ground that Chaparro’s September 2018 motion essentially sought
    to vacate or modify his judgment of conviction, which is not an appropriate remedy
    in a criminal case. See Chaparro v. State, No. A19D0224 (Dec. 19, 2018); see also
    Roberts v. State, 
    286 Ga. 532
    , 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010); Harper v. State, 
    286 Ga. 216
    , 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009).
    Because we rejected Chaparro’s challenge to the trial court order sought to be
    appealed here in Case No. A19D0224, the current appeal is barred by the law of the
    case. See Ross v. State, 
    310 Ga. App. 326
    , 327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (“[A]ny issue
    that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding
    on this Court . . . .”) (punctuation omitted); accord Hook v. Bergen, 
    286 Ga. App. 258
    ,
    261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007) (a ruling on an application for discretionary appeal
    1
    Chaparro’s September 2018 motion was not included in the current record on
    appeal.
    acts as res judicata in later proceedings); see also Jackson v. State, 
    273 Ga. 320
    , 320
    (540 SE2d 612) (2001) (a defendant “is not entitled to another bite at the apple by
    way of a second appeal”). Consequently, there is nothing for this Court to review in
    the instant appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jackson, 
    273 Ga. at 320
    ; Ross,
    310 Ga. App. at 327-328.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    04/10/2019
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A19A1643

Filed Date: 4/11/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/11/2019