Cat Daddy Corner Condominium Association, Inc. v. La Mara II, Inc., D/B/A Los Arcos ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    October 23, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19I0052. CAT DADDY CORNER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
    v. LA MARA II, INC., d/b/a LOS ARCOS, et al.
    Cat Daddy Corner Condominium Association, Inc. (the “Association”) seeks
    interlocutory review of a trial court order entered in two cases. In the first case filed
    in 2016, La Mara II, Inc. d/b/a Los Arcos (“Los Arcos”) sought injunctive relief,
    requesting among other things that the court enjoin the Association from fining Los
    Arcos for its use of parking spaces and revoke all amendments to the condominium
    declaration. The parties entered a consent judgment, and the case was dismissed with
    prejudice. In the second case, which was filed in 2018, the Association filed a
    complaint seeking judicial foreclosure and injunctive relief. The order on appeal
    grants Los Arcos’s motion to set aside the judgment in the 2016 case, grants
    Northside Bank’s motions to intervene in the 2016 and 2018 cases, denies the
    Association’s motion to dismiss Los Arcos’s third party complaint, and granted Los
    Arcos’s motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction. The trial court
    certified its order for immediate review, and the Association filed both a notice of
    appeal and the instant application.
    The grant or denial of an interlocutory injunction is directly appealable under
    OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4). See Haygood v. Tilley, 
    295 Ga. App. 90
    , 90 n. 1 (670 SE2d
    800) (2008). Accordingly, the order in this case is subject to direct appeal.
    Moreover, all rulings within that order and any other non-final rulings entered in the
    case may also be raised as part of such a direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (d);
    Southeast Ceramics v. Klem, 
    246 Ga. 294
    , 295 (1) (271 SE2d 199) (1980). “This
    Court will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order complained
    of is subject to direct appeal and the applicants have not otherwise filed a notice of
    appeal.” Spivey v. Hembree, 
    268 Ga. App. 485
    , 486, n. 1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004).
    Ordinarily, this Court would grant the application under Spivey. Here, however, the
    Association asserts in its application that it filed a notice of appeal. This application
    is thus superfluous and is DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    10/23/2018
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A19I0052

Filed Date: 11/1/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2018