Wanda Corley Haight v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    January 25, 2017
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A1795. WANDA CORLEY HAIGHT et al. v. TRANSCONTINENTAL
    GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.
    Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC, which plans to build a natural
    gas pipeline in north Georgia, sued multiple parties who own property in the
    pipeline’s proposed path for access to their land to conduct civil, environmental, and
    cultural-resource surveys required by federal law. Transcontinental later filed a
    motion for a preliminary injunction allowing it temporary access to the properties.
    Following a hearing, the trial court granted Transcontinental’s motion. The court’s
    order provided that “[t]his interlocutory relief shall expire 180 days from the date of
    this order, Monday, April 4, 2016.” The City of Atlanta, one of the defendants, filed
    a motion to stay enforcement of the preliminary injunction pending an appeal, but the
    trial court denied that motion.
    Five of the defendants (collectively, “the Corleys”) filed a notice of appeal to
    the Supreme Court indicating their wish to appeal the orders granting
    Transcontinental’s preliminary injunction and denying the City’s request for a stay.
    The appeal was docketed in the Supreme Court on March 3, 2016. Transcontinental
    filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the appeal was moot because the surveys had
    been completed and the injunction order had expired by its own terms. The Corleys
    responded that the appeal was not moot because they had been harmed by
    Transcontinental’s intrusion onto their land, Transcontinental could seek additional
    surveys in the future, and the issues presented here were capable of repetition yet
    evaded review.
    The Supreme Court did not expressly rule on Transcontinental’s motion to
    dismiss. Instead, on April 26, 2016, that Court entered an order transferring the case
    here on the ground that subject-matter jurisdiction lies in this Court. The Supreme
    Court’s transfer order provides, in relevant part:
    Appellants filed a notice of appeal directed to this Court, asserting that
    jurisdiction was proper in this Court pursuant to its jurisdiction over
    equity cases. However, as the injunction issue is now moot, and the
    only claims still pending on appeal implicate the jurisdiction of the
    Court of Appeals, not this Court, this appeal hereby is transferred to the
    Court of Appeals[.]
    (Emphasis supplied.)
    We now address Transcontinental’s motion to dismiss. Despite the Corleys’
    arguments that the appeal is not moot, the Supreme Court resolved this issue
    adversely to them. “[T]he law of the case rule makes any ruling by the Supreme
    Court binding in all subsequent proceedings in that case in the lower courts.” Shadix
    v. Carroll County, 
    274 Ga. 560
    , 562 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001) (punctuation and
    footnote omitted). “It is apodictic that Georgia’s appellate courts are required to
    adhere to the law of the case rule in all matters which they consider.” Security Life
    Ins. Co. of Am. v. Clark, 
    273 Ga. 44
    , 46 (1) (535 SE2d 234) (2000). We are bound
    by the Supreme Court’s ruling that “the injunction issue is now moot.” The only
    other issue on appeal appears to be the City’s request for a stay of the injunction
    pending appeal, which likewise is moot.1
    Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3), an appeal will be dismissed if the question
    presented has become moot. Accordingly, Transcontinental’s motion to dismiss is
    GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
    1
    In their appellate briefing, the Corleys claim that Transcontinental damaged
    their land while conducting its surveys. But the Corleys have not asserted a claim for
    damages, and the trial court has made no ruling respecting damages. Accordingly,
    the issue of damages is not before us.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    01/25/2017
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A1795

Filed Date: 1/25/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/25/2017