Ok Lake Lanier, Lllp v. Charles Holston ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    November 08, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A17I0055. OK LAKE LANIER, LLLP et al. v. CHARLES HOLSTON et al.
    OK Lake Lanier LLLP and Kolter Signature Homes GA, LLC (collectively the
    “Lanier Defendants”) filed this application for interlocutory review of the trial court’s
    order denying their motion for summary judgment. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only
    if the trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate
    review should be had. The trial court reentered its order denying summary judgment
    on September 26, 2016, because the Lanier Defendants sought a certificate of
    immediate review outside the ten-day window proscribed by statute. The Lanier
    Defendants then obtained a timely certificate of review on that same date. However,
    OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) also mandates the filing of the interlocutory application within
    ten days after entry of the certificate of immediate review. The Lanier Defendants
    filed their interlocutory application on October 13, 2016, 17 days after the entry of
    the certificate of immediate review. Accordingly, this application is untimely.
    In light of their untimely application, the Lanier Defendants filed an emergency
    motion for extension of time to file their application. Pursuant to Court of Appeals
    Rule 30 (g), however, “[n]o extension of time shall be granted for filing of
    interlocutory applications.” “[W]hen the order appealed from is an interlocutory
    order, the appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction unless the procedure of OCGA
    § 5-6-34 (b) for interlocutory appeal is followed.” Cherry v. Coast House, Ltd., 
    257 Ga. 403
    , 404 (2) (359 SE2d 904) (1987).
    In light of the above, the Lanier Defendants’ emergency motion is hereby
    DENIED, and because they failed to follow our interlocutory appeal procedure, this
    application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    11/08/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A17I0055

Filed Date: 11/21/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/21/2016