Melvin Harris v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    July 15, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A1382. MELVIN HARRIS v. THE STATE.
    In 2005, Melvin Harris was convicted of rape and possession of a firearm by
    a convicted felon. His convictions were affirmed on appeal in Harris v. State, 
    283 Ga. App. 374
     (641 SE2d 619) (2007). In 2015, Harris filed a “Motion to Vacate Void and
    Illegal Sentences” alleging, inter alia, that his sentence of life without parole for rape
    is illegal because he had not been previously convicted of a “serious violent felony.”
    The trial court dismissed the motion, and Harris filed this direct appeal.
    A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to correct
    a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact,
    void or illegal. See Harper v. State, 
    286 Ga. 216
    , n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg
    v. State, 
    297 Ga. App. 118
    , 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void
    sentence generally are limited to claims that — even assuming the existence and
    validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed — the law does not
    authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment
    for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 
    293 Ga. 569
    ,
    572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013) (citations omitted).
    Here, Harris was not sentenced as a recidivist based on a prior conviction for
    a “serious violent felony” within the meaning of OCGA §§ 17-10-6.1 and 17-10-7
    (b). Rather, Harris was sentenced as a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7 (a) and (c),
    neither of which requires a prior conviction for a serious violent felony. Given
    Harris’s numerous prior felony convictions, his life sentence for rape does not impose
    punishment that the law does not authorize. See OCGA §§ 16-6-1 (b); 17-10-7 (a),
    (c). Because Harris has not raised a colorable claim that his sentence is void, this
    appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See von Thomas, 
    supra at 575
    (3); Thomas v. State, 
    334 Ga. App. 4
     (778 SE2d 18) (2015).
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    07/15/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A1382

Filed Date: 7/18/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/18/2016