Ellen Curiel Strauss F/K/A Ellen Curiel Francis v. Eddie Yeheskel Francis ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •   Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    February 07, 2019
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19D0272. ELLEN CURIEL STRAUSS f/k/a ELLEN CURIEL FRANCIS v.
    EDDIE YEHESKEL FRANCIS.
    In lower court case no. 2016-CV-273184, the father, Eddie Yeheskel Francis,
    filed a motion for modification of alimony and child support against the mother, Ellen
    Curiel Strauss f/k/a Ellen Curiel Francis. On September 25, 2017, the superior court
    entered its order on the modification motion. In that order, the superior court
    specifically reserved ruling on the issue of attorney fees. In lower court case no.
    2003-CV-68313, the mother filed a contempt action against the father for unpaid
    alimony and child support. On December 10, 2018, the superior court enter its final
    order on contempt and denied the mother’s request for attorney fees. Thereafter, on
    January 8, 2019, the mother filed this application for discretionary appeal of the
    superior court’s modification order, asserting that the interlocutory order is now final
    based on the denial of attorney fees in the contempt case.1 The father has filed a
    motion to dismiss the application because the order is not final. We agree.
    There is no indication in the record that these two lower court cases were
    consolidated below. And there does not appear to be any order addressing the issue
    of attorney fees in the modification case. Therefore, the modification case is still
    pending below and the mother was required to follow the interlocutory appeal
    procedure to obtain appellate review of the modification order. See CitiFinancial
    Svcs., Inc. v. Holland, 
    310 Ga. App. 480
    , 481 (713 SE2d 678) (2011); Miller v.
    1
    The mother has also filed an application for discretionary appeal of the superior
    court’s contempt order. See Case No. A19D0271.
    Miller, 
    282 Ga. 164
    , 165 (646 SE2d 469) (2007). Consequently, the mother’s failure
    to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this
    application. The father’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this application is
    hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    02/07/2019
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A19D0272

Filed Date: 2/11/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/11/2019