The City of Byron, Georgia v. the City of Warner Robins, Georgia ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    May 02, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A1533. THE CITY OF BYRON, GEORGIA et al. v. THE CITY OF
    WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA.
    The City of Warner Robins, Georgia (“Warner Robins”) filed suit against the
    City of Byron, Georgia and several other defendants seeking inter alia mandamus
    relief requiring the City of Byron to comply with an inter-governmental agreement
    regarding the provision of wastewater services. Warner Robins moved for summary
    judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. The defendants seek to appeal this
    ruling.
    Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction
    over all cases involving extraordinary remedies, including mandamus. See Ga. Const.
    of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (5); Ladzinske v. Allen, 
    280 Ga. 264
     (626 SE2d 83)
    (2006) (“‘[C]ases involving the grant or denial of mandamus are within the exclusive
    jurisdiction of [the Supreme] Court without regard to the underlying subject matter
    or the legal issues raised.’”) Here, although the trial court did not employ the word
    “mandamus,” its order granting summary judgment could be construed as one
    granting mandamus relief. See, e. g., CCC Builders, Inc. v. City Council of Augusta,
    
    237 Ga. 589
    , 591 (229 SE2d 349) (1976) (a municipality may be compelled to
    perform contractual duties either through an action for mandamus relief or a claim for
    specific performance); Forest City Gun Club v. Chatham County., 
    280 Ga. App. 219
    ,
    220 (633 SE2d 623) (2006) (orders are construed according to substance rather than
    nomenclature).
    Because it appears this case may involve the grant of mandamus relief, it is
    hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. See Saxton v. Coastal
    Dialysis &c., 
    267 Ga. 177
    , 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996) (Supreme Court has the
    ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction).
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    05/02/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A1533

Filed Date: 5/11/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/11/2016