Shannon Briley-Holmes v. Metrobrokers LLC ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    March 29, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A18D0368. SHANNON BRILEY-HOLMES v. METROBROKERS LLC, et al.
    Shannon Briley-Holmes1 has filed a timely application for discretionary review
    from the state court’s February 8, 2018 order finding her in civil contempt for failing
    to respond to post-judgment discovery motions.2 The court also found Briley-Holmes
    in contempt for failing to pay attorney fees and litigation costs in an earlier
    proceeding. Additionally, Briley-Holmes seeks review of the state court’s denial of
    her motion to set aside an incarceration order, pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), due
    to her repeated refusal to comply with court orders. A discretionary application,
    however, was not necessary here.
    Judgments of contempt are directly appealable. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (2); In re
    Booker, 
    186 Ga. App. 614
    , 614 (367 SE2d 850) (1988). Ordinarily, “the denial of a
    motion to set aside a final judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 is not directly appealable
    and instead requires the filing of an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA
    § 5-6-35 (b).” Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 
    283 Ga. App. 116
    , 116 (640 SE2d
    1
    Briley-Holmes initiated this action in 2010 when she filed a complaint against
    multiple defendants, alleging that they fraudulently induced her to purchase a multi-
    family residential unit in 2006. The state court granted the defendants’ motion for
    summary judgment. The court also awarded the defendants attorney fees, concluding
    that the complaint lacked substantial justification and had no justiciable legal or
    factual issue.
    2
    The state court also awarded attorney fees to Defendant Don Hill for
    prosecuting the contempt motion, but Briley-Holmes has not contested this ruling in
    her application.
    688) (2006); see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). However, here the order denying Briley-
    Holmes’s motion to set aside the incarceration order is being appealed along with a
    directly appealable ruling. Thus, no application is required. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (d)
    (“Where an appeal is taken . . . all judgments, rulings, or orders rendered in the case
    which are raised on appeal and which may affect the proceedings below shall be
    reviewed and determined by the appellate court, without regard to the appealability
    of the judgment, ruling, or order standing alone”).
    We will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the
    lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly,
    this application is hereby GRANTED, and Briley-Holmes shall have ten days from
    the date of this order to file her notice of appeal with the state court. If she has already
    filed a notice of appeal in the state court, she need not file an additional notice. The
    clerk of the state court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the records
    transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    03/29/2018
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A18D0368

Filed Date: 4/5/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/5/2018