Reservation Services Group, LLC v. State of Georgia Ex Rel. John D. Sours, Administrator of the Fair Business Practices Act ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    September 15, 2014
    ATLANTA,__________________
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A14A1976. RESERVATION SERVICES GROUP, LLC v. STATE OF
    GEORGIA.
    The State of Georgia, acting through the Governor’s Office of Consumer
    Protection, served an investigative demand on Reservation Services Group, LLC
    (“RSG”), a Florida company, pursuant to OCGA § 10-1-403 (a). RSG refused to
    comply with the demand. The State then filed a petition in superior court to compel
    compliance with the investigative demand pursuant to OCGA § 10-1-404 (b). The
    superior court granted the petition, and RSG appealed directly to this Court.
    The State has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that RSG could obtain
    appellate review only by filing an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA
    § 5-6-35 (a) (1). That Code section requires a discretionary application in “[a]ppeals
    from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of . . . state and local
    administrative agencies.” In Tri-State Building & Supply v. Reid, 
    251 Ga. 38
     (302
    SE2d 566) (1983), the Supreme Court held that an investigative demand is a
    “decision” of a state agency, and that a superior court’s review of that decision must,
    therefore, be appealed by discretionary application. RSG argues that Tri-State does
    not apply because there, the defendant filed an action in superior court to quash the
    investigative demand, whereas here, the State filed an action to compel compliance
    with the demand. This is a distinction without a difference; in both cases, the superior
    court reviewed a decision of a state agency.
    Based on the Supreme Court’s controlling decision in Tri-State, the State’s
    motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of
    jurisdiction due to RSG’s failure to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure.
    Our previous order granting oral argument in this case is vacated.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    09/15/2014
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A14A1976

Filed Date: 9/22/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014