Craig L. Jones v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    June 02, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A16A1757. CRAIG L. JONES v. THE STATE.
    In 2012, Craig L. Jones pled guilty to battery, criminal trespass and aggravated
    stalking.1 In February 2016, he filed a Motion to Modify a Void Sentence. The trial
    court denied the motion, and Jones appeals.
    Jones’s motion is, in substance, an effort to set aside or vacate his convictions.
    But as the Supreme Court has made clear, a post-conviction motion seeking to vacate
    an allegedly void criminal conviction is not one of the established procedures for
    challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case, and an appeal from the trial
    court’s ruling on such a petition should be dismissed. See Roberts v. State, 
    286 Ga. 532
     (690 SE2d 150) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or
    dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable
    claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See Harper v. State, 
    286 Ga. 216
    ,
    217 (1), n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 
    297 Ga. App. 118
    , 119 (676 SE2d
    465) (2009). Jones’s motion, however, presented challenges to his convictions, not
    his sentence. Because Jones may not attack his convictions in this manner and
    1
    Jones has been before this Court several times. He filed two untimely direct
    appeals — one from the trial court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence,
    and another from the trial court’s order denying his request for a hearing — both of
    which we dismissed. See Case No. A14A1554 (decided May 6, 2014); Case No.
    A14A1556 (decided May 6, 2014). In addition, he filed an untimely discretionary
    application seeking review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for minutes of a
    grand jury proceeding. See Case No. A15D0459 (decided July 9, 2015). He also
    appealed from the trial court’s denial of writ of mandamus, which we transferred to
    the Supreme Court. See Case No. A14A1555 (decided May 5, 2014).
    because he did not assert a colorable void-sentence claim, this appeal is hereby
    DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    06/02/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A16A1757

Filed Date: 6/10/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/10/2016