Randarius Perry v. State , 329 Ga. App. 121 ( 2014 )

FOURTH DIVISION
DOYLE, P. J.,
MILLER and DILLARD, JJ.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be
physically received in our clerk’s office within ten
days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.
http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
September 24, 2014
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia
A14A0766. PERRY v. THE STATE.
MILLER, Judge.
A jury found Randarius Perry guilty of four counts of violating the Georgia
Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act (OCGA § 16-15-1 et seq.) (Counts 57
through 60), armed robbery (OCGA § 16-8-41 (a)) (Count 61), aggravated assault
(OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (1) (2010)) (Count 62), and two counts of possession of a
firearm during the commission of a felony (OCGA § 16-11-106 (b) (1)) (Counts 63
and 64). Perry appeals from his convictions, however, the case is not final and ripe
for appeal.
At sentencing, the trial court orally announced that Count 58 would merge into
Count 57, Count 60 would merge into Count 59, Count 62 merged into Count 61, and
count 64 merged into Count 63. The record, however, shows that the court only
entered written sentences on Counts 57, 59, 61, and 63. The trial court did not enter
written sentences on Counts 58, 60, 62, or 64, nor did the trial court enter a notation
showing that these counts merged into other counts for purposes of sentencing.
When “a multi-count indictment is the subject of one trial and the fact-finder
returns a verdict of guilty on each count of the indictment, the case is not final and
subject to appeal until a sentence has been entered on each count of the indictment.”
Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 (571 SE2d 806) (2002). Since the trial court did not enter
a written sentence on each count, Perry’s case is still pending in the trial court and is
not ripe for appeal. Id. Therefore, this case is remanded with direction for the trial
court to enter a written sentence disposing of all counts of which Perry was found
guilty. “After such entry, the case may be transmitted to this [C]ourt for re-docketing
because the notice of appeal, prematurely filed, then will have ripened.” (Footnote
omitted.) Bass v. State, 284 Ga. App. 331, 332 (643 SE2d 851) (2007).
Case remanded with direction. Doyle, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.
2