MARVIN B. SMITH, III v. HSBC BANK U.S.A. N.A. ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    December 14, 2017
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A18D0189. MARVIN B. SMITH, III, et al. v. HSBC BANK U.S.A. N.A.
    This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following
    an adverse ruling in that court, defendants Marvin B. Smith, III, and Sharon Smith
    appealed to the superior court, which entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The
    defendants then appealed directly to this Court, and the appeal was dismissed based
    upon the Smiths’ failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See Case
    Number A17A0663, dismissed Dec. 13, 2016.
    The Smiths subsequently filed a motion to set aside in the superior court,
    challenging the validity of the underlying judgment. On September 5, 2017, the
    superior court entered an order denying the motion. The Smiths filed an application
    for discretionary appeal from this ruling on October 4, 2017.1 We, however, lack
    jurisdiction.
    Generally, an application for discretionary appeal may be filed within 30 days
    of entry of the order or judgment sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d).
    The underlying subject matter of an appeal, however, controls over the relief sought
    in determining the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 
    264 Ga. 467
    , 467-
    468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory
    judgment. Under OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a dispossessory judgment must
    be filed within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright,
    Inc. v. Jones, 
    239 Ga. App. 521
    , 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999).
    1
    The Smiths directed their application to the Supreme Court, which
    transferred it to this Court.
    Here, the Smiths filed their application 29 days after the superior court’s order
    was entered. Accordingly, the application is untimely and is therefore DISMISSED
    for lack of jurisdiction.2
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    12/14/2017
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    2
    We do not address whether the application is also barred by the law of the
    case rule. See OCGA § 9-11-60 (h) (rulings by an appellate court are binding as
    the law of the case and may not be set aside); Williams v. State, 
    335 Ga. App. 468
    ,
    469 (1) (781 SE2d 791) (2016) (appellate court’s dismissal of appeal effectively
    affirmed the lower court’s ruling and became the law of the case).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A18D0189

Filed Date: 1/2/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/2/2018