Roy Boone Bright v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    May 15, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A18D0450. ROY BOONE BRIGHT v. THE STATE.
    In 2015, after a jury trial in which Roy Boone Bright represented himself, the
    jury found Bright guilty of burglary and theft by taking. In 2017, Bright was granted
    a new trial because there was no record that Bright had waived his right to counsel
    at a Faretta hearing.1 Since the grant of his motion for new trial, Bright has filed
    multiple pre-trial motions,2 including a motion for disqualification and recusal of the
    trial judge. The trial court denied Bright’s motion for disqualification and recusal,
    and Bright filed this application for discretionary appeal. We, however, lack
    jurisdiction.
    Because Bright’s case remains pending below, Bright was required to follow
    the interlocutory application procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), which
    include obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court, to obtain
    appellate review at this time. See Murphy v. Murphy, 
    322 Ga. App. 829
     (747 SE2d
    21) (2013) (dismissing appeal from recusal order based on failure to follow the
    interlocutory appeal procedure). Although Bright filed an application for
    discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35, compliance with that procedure
    does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from
    complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v.
    1
    See Faretta v. California, 
    422 U. S. 806
     (95 SCt 2525, 45 LE2d 562) (1975).
    2
    See Case Nos. A18D0384 (dismissed for failure to follow interlocutory appeal
    procedures on April 12, 2018) and A18D0394 (granted under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j) in
    April 12, 2018).
    Bailey, 
    266 Ga. 832
     (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Bright’s failure to comply with the
    interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over this application,
    which is hereby DISMISSED
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    05/15/2018
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A18D0450

Filed Date: 6/4/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/4/2018