Linnette Yard v. Terry Yard ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    January 29, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A18A0885. LINNETTE YARD v. TERRY YARD.
    In this divorce action, the wife Linnette Yard and the husband Terry Yard were
    divorced pursuant to a divorce decree entered by the trial court on July 20, 2017. The
    wife filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied on August 25, 2017. The
    wife then filed a motion for reconsideration and motion to reopen for fraud, which the
    trial court denied on September 14, 2017. The wife filed this direct appeal on October
    12, 2017. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    First, “[a]ppeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other
    domestic relations cases” must be made by application for discretionary appeal.
    OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2).        The wife’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal
    procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal. See Russo v. Manning,
    
    252 Ga. 155
    , 156 (312 SE2d 319) (1984).
    Second, the appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days
    of the entry of the order or judgment sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a).
    Although a timely motion for new trial extends the time for filing a notice of appeal, see
    OCGA § 5-6-38 (a), here the trial court denied the wife’s motion for new trial on
    August 25, 2017, and the wife did not file her appeal until October 12, 2017, 48 days
    later. Although the wife filed a motion for reconsideration and motion to reopen for
    fraud in the interim, the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not directly
    appealable, and the filing of such a motion does not extend the time for filing an
    appeal. See Bell v. Cohran, 
    244 Ga. App. 510
    , 510-511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000);
    Savage v. Newsome, 
    173 Ga. App. 271
    , 271-272 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). Further, to the
    extent the wife’s motion to reopen for fraud was in substance a motion to set aside
    under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (2), she was required to file an application for
    discretionary appeal to seek appellate review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8).
    For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    01/29/2018
    I certif y that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A18A0885

Filed Date: 1/30/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021