Sam S. Khuri v. Carrington Place Neighborhood Association, Inc. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    August 15, 2022
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A23A0105. SAM S. KHURI v. CARRINGTON PLACE NEIGHBORHOOD
    ASSOCIATION, INC.
    Carrington Place Neighborhood Association, Inc. (“CPNA”) filed a complaint
    against Sam S. Khuri. On July 8, 2021, the trial court entered default judgment
    against Khuri. On July 21, Khuri filed an “Emergency Motion for Recon[s]ideration
    and to Set Aside/Vacate Judgement,” arguing that CPNA had not properly served him
    with the complaint or motion for default judgment. On August 23, the trial court
    denied the motion, and on September 13, Khuri filed a notice of appeal. CPNA has
    filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that Khuri was required to file a
    discretionary application.
    To the extent that Khuri’s motion was one for reconsideration, his appeal is
    untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment
    sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice
    of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer appellate jurisdiction on an appellate
    court.” Perlman v. Perlman, 
    318 Ga. App. 731
    , 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012)
    (punctuation omitted). Khuri’s notice of appeal was filed 67 days after entry of the
    default judgment. Although Khuri filed a motion for reconsideration within 30 days
    of the judgment, motions for reconsideration do not extend the time to appeal from
    the underlying decision, and the order resolving the motion is not itself a directly
    appealable judgment. See Ferguson v. Freeman, 
    282 Ga. 180
    , 181 (1) (646 SE2d 65)
    (2007); Bell v. Cohran, 
    244 Ga. App. 510
    , 510 (536 SE2d 187) (2000) (“a motion for
    reconsideration does not toll the time for filing a direct appeal”).
    To the extent that Khuri’s motion was one to set aside, he was not entitled to
    a direct appeal. OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (1) authorizes motions to set aside for lack of
    jurisdiction over the person, which may arise—as Khuri alleged here—from invalid
    service. See Burch v. Dines, 
    267 Ga. App. 459
    , 461 (2) (600 SE2d 374) (2004).
    Further, “[i]n situations where a final judgment has been entered, default cannot be
    opened unless and until the final judgment has been set aside pursuant to OCGA §
    9-11-60 (d).” Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 
    283 Ga. App. 116
    , 116 (640 SE2d
    688) (2006) (citation and punctuation omitted). The denial of a motion to set aside a
    final judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) is not directly appealable and requires the
    filing of an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35. Jim Ellis
    Atlanta, 283 Ga. App. at 116; accord OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). “Compliance with the
    discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human
    Resources, 
    221 Ga. App. 257
    , 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996).
    Thus, whether Khuri’s motion is construed as a motion for reconsideration or
    a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), we lack jurisdiction to entertain his
    appeal. CPNA’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is
    DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    08/15/2022
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A23A0105

Filed Date: 8/15/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/15/2022