Gwinnett County v. John Newton ( 2016 )

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
February 16, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16I0127. GWINNETT COUNTY et al. v. JOHN NEWTON.
John Newton filed this civil action against Gwinnett County and the Gwinnett
County Sheriff in his official capacity. Newton asserted that he was entitled to
damages for injuries he sustained while being unloaded from a bus that had
transported him from the Gwinnett County Jail to the Gwinnett County Justice
Center. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted, on the ground that Newton’s claims are barred by
sovereign immunity. The trial court summarily denied the motion to dismiss without
explanation. The court subsequently certified its order for immediate review, and the
defendants filed this application for interlocutory appeal.
Ordinarily, the denial of a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order, and can
be appealed only through the interlocutory appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-34
(b). Under the collateral order doctrine,1 however, a direct appeal may be had from
“an order that denies a motion to dismiss, based on a conclusive determination that
the State (or a state officer or employee) is not immune from suit on the basis of
sovereign immunity.” Bd. of Regents v. Canas, 295 Ga. App. 505, 507 (1) (672 SE2d
471) (2009). This proposition is based on the principle that “sovereign immunity is
1
Under this doctrine, an interlocutory order may be appealed directly if it:
“(1) resolves an issue that is substantially separate from the basic issues to be decided
at trial, (2) would result in the loss of an important right if review had to await final
judgment, and (3) completely and conclusively decides the issue on appeal.” Britt v.
State, 282 Ga. 746, 748 (1) (653 SE2d 713) (2007) (punctuation omitted).
an immunity from suit, rather than a mere defense to liability, and is effectively lost
if a case is erroneously permitted to go to trial.” Id.Here, the sole basis for the defendants’ motion to dismiss was that they are
immune from suit based on the facts alleged in Newton’s complaint. The trial court’s
summary denial of this motion thus conclusively determined that the defendants are
not entitled to sovereign immunity from suit arising out of those factual allegations.
See Liberty County School Dist. v. Halliburton, 328 Ga. App. 422, 425-426 (2) (762
SE2d 138) (2014) (holding that the defendants were entitled to a direct appeal from
the denial of their motion to dismiss based on sovereign immunity, notwithstanding
the trial court’s failure to explain its ruling); see also Dept. of Transp. v. Jarvie, 329
Ga. App. 681, 682, n. 2 (766 SE2d 94) (2014) (concluding that the trial court’s one-
sentence order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on sovereign
immunity was directly appealable). “This Court will grant a timely application for
interlocutory review if the order complained of is subject to direct appeal and the
applicants have not otherwise filed a notice of appeal.” Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga.
App. 485, 486, n. 1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004).
Accordingly, this application for interlocutory appeal is hereby GRANTED.
The defendants shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of
appeal in the trial court, if one has not already been filed. The trial court clerk is
instructed to include a copy of this order in the appellate record.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
02/16/2016
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.