Travis Johnson v. State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    January 26, 2017
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A17A0876. TRAVIS JOHNSON v. THE STATE.
    In 2010, Travis Johnson pled guilty to armed robbery, robbery, and possession
    of a firearm during the commission of a crime. The trial court imposed a 20-year
    sentence on the conviction for armed robbery, a consecutive 20-year sentence on the
    conviction for robbery, and a consecutive 5-year sentence on the conviction for
    possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Several years later,
    Johnson filed a motion to correct a void sentence, which the trial court denied on July
    18, 2016. Johnson appealed from that order, but we dismissed his appeal because it
    was untimely and did not raise a valid void-sentence claim. Johnson v. State, Case
    No. A17A0279 (dismissed October 4, 2016).
    In September 2016, Johnson filed another motion to vacate or correct a void
    sentence, which the trial court denied on October 18, 2016. He appealed that decision,
    and we again dismissed his appeal because he failed to raise a valid void sentence
    claim. Johnson v. State, Case No. A17A0601 (dismissed November 30, 2016). Before
    us now is yet another direct appeal from the trial court’s October 18, 2016 order. We
    lack jurisdiction for two reasons.
    First, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order
    sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice
    of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.
    State, 
    264 Ga. 872
    , 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Johnson’s November
    21, 2016 notice of appeal was filed 34 days after the trial court’s October 18, 2016
    order, his appeal is untimely.
    Second, as we stated in our order dismissing Case No. A17A0601, Johnson’s
    motion to vacate or correct a void sentence did not raise a valid void sentence claim.
    “It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. The same is
    true of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds.” Echols v. State, 
    243 Ga. App. 775
    , 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000); see also Jordan v. State, 
    253 Ga. App. 510
    , 511 (2)
    (559 SE2d 528) (2002). Our ruling in the prior case acts as res judicata. See Hook v.
    Bergen, 
    286 Ga. App. 258
    , 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). Thus, Johnson is
    estopped from seeking further judicial review on the validity of his sentence. See id.;
    see also Ross v. State, 
    310 Ga. App. 326
    , 328 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (law of the case
    rules bar successive void sentence appeals). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby
    DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    01/26/2017
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A17A0876

Filed Date: 2/7/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/7/2017