American Mills Co. v. Pruitt-Barrett Hardware Co. , 30 Ga. App. 161 ( 1923 )


Menu:
  • Bloodworth, J.

    The court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant. “The mere fact that there are conflicts in the testimony does not render the direction of a verdict in favor of a party erroneous,' when it appears that the conflicts are immaterial, and that, giving to the opposite party the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence as a whole and of all legitimate inferences therefrom, the verdict against him is demanded.” Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 22 Ga. App. 514 (5), 518 (5) (96 S. E. 450), and citations.

    Judgment affirmed.

    Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J-., conour. J. 0. Adams, B. P. Gaillard Jr., for plaintiff. O. N. Davie, for defendant.

Document Info

Docket Number: 14182

Citation Numbers: 30 Ga. App. 161, 117 S.E. 110, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 328

Judges: Bloodworth

Filed Date: 4/11/1923

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024