-
Luke, J. Eor the alleged reason that the conviction was had upon the uncorroborated testimony of accomplices, the defendant, contends that the court erroneously overruled his motion for a new trial. It is clear, from the record, that the conviction was fully authorized by the evi
*175 dence and was not dependent wholly upon the evidence of accomplices. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.Decided November 15, 1923. John B. Cooper, W. 0. Cooper Jr., for plaintiff in error. B. M. Owen, solicitor-general, contra. Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Bloodwortfo, J., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: 14931
Citation Numbers: 31 Ga. App. 174, 120 S.E. 18, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 817
Judges: Luke
Filed Date: 11/15/1923
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/8/2024