Nash v. Savannah Electric Co. , 19 Ga. App. 175 ( 1917 )


Menu:
  • Broyles, ,P. J.

    Under the particular facts of the case, the petition, construed (as it must be) most strongly against the plaintiff, did not set forth a cause of action, and the court committed no error in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the suit.

    Judgment affirmed.

    Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff,

    cited: Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. McAllister, 126 Ga. 448; Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. Norris, 135 Ga. 838, 843; Macon Ry. Co. v. Vining, 120 Ga. 511; G., C. & N. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 120 Ga. 381; Atlanta Terminal Co. v. Johnson, 15 Ga. App. 22; A. & B. Railroad Co. v. Douglas, 119 Ga. 658; Dorsey v. Central Ry. Co., 113 Ga. 565; King v. S. A. L. Ry., 1 Ga. App. 88; Ellison v. Ga. R. Co., 87 Ga. 692 (8); Central R. Co. v. Thompson, 76 Ga. 770; Wilkes v. W. & A. R. Co., 109 Ga. 794; Central R. Co. v. Gleason, 72 Ga. 742; Central R. Co. v. Perry, 58 Ga. 461 (3).

    Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant, cited and distinguished cases cited above.

Document Info

Docket Number: 7539

Citation Numbers: 19 Ga. App. 175, 91 S.E. 240, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 48

Judges: Broyles

Filed Date: 1/23/1917

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024