Adams v. State ( 1920 )


Menu:
  • Broyles, C. J.

    Under the undisputed facts of this case, the circumstantial evidence relied upon to convict the defendant failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt; and, therefore, his conviction was contrary to law and the evidence.

    Judgment reversed.

    Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Frank H. Harris, for plaintiff in error. F. M, Scarlett Jr,, solicitor, contra:

Document Info

Docket Number: 11264

Judges: Broyles

Filed Date: 4/13/1920

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024